Eric Schmidt (Google): Android is not fragmented

Over the last year, Google Android has been implemented on a great many devices, be it smartphones or tablets. On occasion, we’ve spoken about how at times, Android has taken over that of others such as iOS.

At the CES annual event currently in full swing in Las Vegas, Google’s very own Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt has spoken out about how Android is not fragmented, putting his argument across that in fact there is a “differentiation” between devices.

In a fairly lengthy speech, according to pcmag.com Schmidt was keen to point out that, “Differentiation is positive, fragmentation is negative. Differentiation means that you have a choice and the people who are making the phones, they’re going to compete on their view of innovation, and they’re going to try and convince you that theirs is better than somebody else.”

He then went on to speak about the topic of fragmentation by saying, “Fragmentation, however, means that you have an app and it runs on one device but not the other.” Schmidt explained that Google are hoping to get everyone on Ice Cream Sandwich, with manufacturers being allowed to add or change the UI as long as they don’t break the apps.”

Fragmentation is always seen to be a problem with Android updating the OS. For a more in depth look at what Schmidt had to say head on over to the link in the third paragraph. Tell us what you think?

Comments

3 thoughts on “Eric Schmidt (Google): Android is not fragmented”

  1. Reply
    Anonymous says:

    Google’s Eric Schmidt and Sebasitan Thrun’s reputations are built upon crimes, conspiracies and censorship on my public challenges.

    Google’s Eric Schmidt and Sebastian Thrun are part of these plotted murders. And that innocent Stanford girl May Zhou was murdred by people on their side for their sake during their fight with Stanford Authorities over a criminal case which happened on Stanford campuse in 2004, in which an irrational and brutal lady named Gabriele Scheler bitterly assaulted me in the lab and then falsely accused me for sexual assault trying to escape facing the legal consequences. Eric Schmidt and Sebastian Thrun joined with this criminal suspect Gabriele Scheler to fight against ruling from Stanford Authorities. They had plotted murder on May Zhou to threaten me and to terrorize Stanford; and later, when they found I would not compromise with them but actively pursue the case further, they had plotted a murder on me as well. They didn’t make it a reality in my case because they are closely watched by police and they fear leaving evidence (not because they have any mercy on me as a human being).

    — These accusations stand still which Eric Schmidt and Sebastian Thrun dare never deny to the public. Eric Schmidt and Sebastian Thrun had not paid for their crimes

  2. Reply
    Anonymous says:

    As far as I understood, Eric Schmidt and Sebasitan Thrun had tried to cover up their involvment with the innocent Stanford student May Zhou’s case on the questionable suicide theory in official authorities conclusion. However, after I pointed out major flaw of such suicide theory, authorities no longer insist it’s suicide, but accept that May Zhou’s case is a plotted murder. As I further point out that it is people on Sebastian Thrun and Eric Schmidt’s side who murdered May Zhou for Thrun’s sake to threaten me and to terrorize Stanford.
    If these anti-humanity crimes could not be clarified to the public and criminals concurred at authorities, fascism power on their side would resolve their problems by killing again.

  3. Reply
    Anonymous says:

    If these anti-humanity crimes could not be clarified to the public and criminals concurred at authorities, fascism power on their side would resolve their problems by killing again.

Live Comment

Your email address will not be published.